Subject: [TS] Re: Patent issed for The Brain
From: Jack Park (jackpark@verticalnet.com)
Date: Mon Mar 13 2000 - 14:22:08 EST
Looks to me like they pretty much patented the entire WWW. We "forget"
thoughts by deleting web pages. So do they. We put directionality into our
thoughts with the forward and back buttons. We build thoughts with web
pages, storing information there in a plurality of forms (e.g. .doc, .pdf,
.html, .xml, etc). Gads, this patent may even cover object embedding
(dcom), not to mention Hypercard. Maybe MS will, indeed, buy these folks
out.
My 0.02 euros.
Jack Park
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 07:49:00PM -0800, Michael Simcich wrote:
> I know this was mentioned here a while ago, but apparently it's now
> official. The Brain (www.thebrain.com) by Natrificial has a patent
> approved for their brain technology that "allows any piece of
> information to be linked and accessed from multiple locations within
> the interface - giving users the ability to retrieve and navigate data
> by association".
>
Actually, it's worse than that. Searching for "Natrificial" at
www.patents.ibm.com turns up 4 hits. Their first US patent was just
issued, but there are several international patents (or are those just
applications?). I have read the first international patent, but not the
rest (I didn't know about them until I did this search). It is my
opinion that all common aspects shared by ThoughtStream and the Brain do
not meet the patent criteria of non-obviousness and novelty. If there
are any lawyerly types out there who can help me interpret these
patents, I would definitely appreciate the help. (is Nate still here?)
> I use the Brain, I like it a lot. I really, really, don't want
> Natrificial to own a patent that will ultimately prevent similiar
> dynamic linking interfaces from being developed. If that's what the
> patent is going to amount to it has the potential to impact the
> development of computer interfaces in a very negative way, far
> exceeding the damages that might be caused by the types of ecommerce
> related patents that Amazon has been awarded (which are also a real
> bummer).
I agree. It seems to me that by sponsoring Minciu Sodas's effort to
create an import/export standard, Natrificial is effectively encouraging
the development of similar programs. (unless they're planning to wait
for a standard to get established and then start enforcing their
patents, like Unisys did).
-Ben
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Got Questions? Get Answers. Got Answers? Get Paid. ***
Sign up at Infomarco.com and you can win $30,000 cash or a trip to China.
http://click.egroups.com/1/1251/3/_/6321/_/952975159/
-- Talk to your group with your own voice!
-- http://www.egroups.com/VoiceChatPage?listName=thoughtstream&m=1
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Aug 30 2000 - 22:01:01 EDT