Subject: Re: [TS] CGI vs. Zope
From: Ben Darnell (ben@thoughtstream.org)
Date: Mon Aug 14 2000 - 13:59:21 EDT
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 01:42:10PM -0400, Ben Darnell wrote:
> The poll showed that more of you would like the ThoughtStream web
> interface to use standard CGI instead of Zope (7 to 5). I'd like to
> know why, specifically, you made the decisions you did (on both sides,
> but especially those of you who chose CGI). Is it because of the
> difficulty of finding Zope hosting? Efficiency concerns? Integration
> with existing software? Something else entirely? Does your opinion
> about Zope extend to other emerging technologies (e.g. WebDAV)?
BTW, can anyone suggest a good HTML template module (like
DocumentTemplate, but not tied to Zope)? In particular I want something
that supports iteration (like dtml-in). I could just split
DocumentTemplate off of Zope (I think it's even available as a separate
download), although it might be rather slow in a CGI (although it won't
really matter, since without some kind of persistence CGI is painfully
slow anyway).
-Ben
-- Ben Darnell ben@thoughtstream.org http://thoughtstream.org Finger bgdarnel@debian.org for PGP/GPG key 1024D/1F06E509--------------------------------------------------------------------<e|- Test your WML code with our Online WAP Testing Tool at http://click.egroups.com/1/7799/7/_/6321/_/966275959/ --------------------------------------------------------------------|e>-
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Aug 30 2000 - 22:01:01 EDT